Last Call Review of draft-ietf-spring-bfd-12
review-ietf-spring-bfd-12-tsvart-lc-trammell-2025-01-27-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-spring-bfd |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Transport Area Review Team (tsvart) | |
| Deadline | 2025-01-21 | |
| Requested | 2025-01-06 | |
| Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
| Authors | Greg Mirsky , Jeff Tantsura , Ilya Varlashkin , Mach Chen , Jiang Wenying | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-03-17 (Latest revision 2024-09-10) | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -12
by Loa Andersson
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -12 by Brian Trammell Secdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Stefan Santesson |
|
| Comments |
This is a BFD-focused document; familiarity with the topic would be helpful. If available, the reviewers who read draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo would be ideal. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Brian Trammell |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-spring-bfd by Transport Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/T8UCWCZ5C4WYxqpsq91zWXf3pqM | |
| Reviewed revision | 12 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2025-01-27 |
review-ietf-spring-bfd-12-tsvart-lc-trammell-2025-01-27-00
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF discussion list for information. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review. From a transport standpoint, this document is ready, as it presents no new concerns with respect to the interaction between BFD and the transport layer. I have not reviewed the document in detail for the correctness of the interactions between BFD and SR, and will rely on the RTG and GEN reviews of this document as to its utility to its intended audience. (While the normal operating envelope of the BFD system of protocols is probably RFC 8085 compliant by default, I continue to rely on trust that implementors of routing-layer protocols encapsulated in UDP/IP will follow the guidance in 8085. But that concern is by no means specific to this specification.)