IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy-13
review-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy-13-genart-lc-even-2025-12-15-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2025-12-19
Requested 2025-12-05
Authors Christian Schmutzer , Zafar Ali , Praveen Maheshwari , Reza Rokui , Andrew Stone
I-D last updated 2026-05-20 (Latest revision 2026-03-12)
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -10 by Matthew Bocci (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Jacqueline McCall (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by Luigi Iannone (diff)
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by Dhruv Dhody (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Roni Even (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/bS-vYrQXoXLNWv50s8nYwYJr8gk
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 17)
Result Almost ready
Completed 2025-12-15
review-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy-13-genart-lc-even-2025-12-15-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2025-12-15
IETF LC End Date: 2025-12-19
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: the document is almost ready for publication as informational RFC.
There are nine normative references that are specified as drafts. Yet some are
already published , for example the first one is rfc9857. So first update the
references. Still I assume that the chairs are ok with sending the document to
publication considering the number of non RFC references.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: