Last Call Review of draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-11
review-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-11-secdir-lc-zhang-2017-06-09-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-05-04 | |
Requested | 2017-04-20 | |
Authors | Clarence Filsfils , Stefano Previdi , Bruno Decraene , Rob Shakir | |
I-D last updated | 2017-06-09 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -08
by Lou Berger
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Sheng Jiang (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Dacheng Zhang (diff) Genart Last Call review of -08 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff) Genart Telechat review of -11 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Dacheng Zhang |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 12) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-06-09 |
review-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-11-secdir-lc-zhang-2017-06-09-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments This document identifies and describes the requirements for a set of use cases related to network resiliency on Segment Routing (SPRING) networks. This informational document introduces the candidate solutions/use cases which could be applied to enhance the network resiliency on SPRING networks when failures occurs. I think this work does not bring any additional security issue. The document is READY for publication. Thanks, Dacheng