Last Call Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-07
review-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-07-secdir-lc-mundy-2017-12-14-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2017-11-30
Requested 2017-11-03
Draft last updated 2017-12-14
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -04 by Jonathan Hardwick (diff)
Rtgdir Telechat review of -07 by Andrew Malis (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Russ Mundy (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Russ Mundy
State Completed
Review review-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-07-secdir-lc-mundy-2017-12-14
Reviewed rev. 07 (document currently at 10)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2017-12-14

Review
review-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-07-secdir-lc-mundy-2017-12-14

Reviewer: Russ Mundy
Review result: Ready

Hi, 

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready

As with a number of ID’s, there is a significant amount of referencing of other RFCs/IDs - so much so, that it is difficult to get a clear understanding of what is being specified in the document itself (the diagrams are very useful - well done). However, since this ID has an intended status of Informational, the amount of referencing is probably acceptable but I would recommend that at least RFC4272 be included in the Informative References list.


Russ