Last Call Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-18
review-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-18-secdir-lc-dunbar-2019-02-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 22)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-03-07
Requested 2019-02-21
Authors Ahmed Bashandy , Clarence Filsfils , Stefano Previdi , Bruno Decraene , Stephane Litkowski , Rob Shakir
I-D last updated 2019-02-28
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -13 by Sasha Vainshtein (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -18 by Sasha Vainshtein (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -18 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -18 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 18 (document currently at 22)
Result Ready
Completed 2019-02-28
review-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-18-secdir-lc-dunbar-2019-02-28-00
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

The document provides the detailed explanation of SR-MPLS processing in
addition to RFC 8402. Since SR-MPLS are in the trusted domain, it is assumed
that there is no malicious attacks to the nodes for the data plane and control
plane.  RFC8402 already has the good description on the Security Consideration
for both SR-MPLS & SRv6.

Linda Dunbar