Last Call Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-06
review-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-06-secdir-lc-takahashi-2017-12-12-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2017-12-14 | |
| Requested | 2017-11-30 | |
| Authors | Clarence Filsfils , Stefano Previdi , Gaurav Dawra , Ebben Aries , Petr Lapukhov | |
| I-D last updated | 2017-12-12 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -03
by Susan Hares
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU) (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff) Tsvart Telechat review of -08 by Martin Stiemerling (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Takeshi Takahashi |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2017-12-12 |
review-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-06-secdir-lc-takahashi-2017-12-12-00
The security consideration section is concise, but it well represents its security status by saying "The solution proposed in this document does not introduce any additional security concerns from what expressed in [RFC7938] and [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid]".