Last Call Review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-17

Request Review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 19)
Type Last Call Review
Team Transport Area Review Team (tsvart)
Deadline 2020-08-26
Requested 2020-08-12
Authors Clarence Filsfils, Pablo Camarillo, John Leddy, Daniel Voyer, Satoru Matsushima, Zhenbin Li
Draft last updated 2020-08-18
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -17 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -17 by Mirja K├╝hlewind (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -17 by Brian Weis (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -19 by Brian Weis
Intdir Telechat review of -18 by Brian Haberman (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Mirja K├╝hlewind
State Completed
Review review-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-17-tsvart-lc-kuehlewind-2020-08-18
Posted at
Reviewed rev. 17 (document currently at 19)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2020-08-18


This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC if you reply to or forward this review.

This review did not identify any transport-related issues.

- maybe spell out PE on first occurrence in section 4.8.
- Also maybe spell out BUM in section 4.12 (as well as other abbreviation there). Also shouldn't it be s/BUM/BUM traffic/ ?
- sec 4.13: s/multiple domains. it is one/multiple domains. It is one/
- Would be good to spell out PSP, USP and USD right at the beginning of section 4.16