Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-17

Request Review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 28)
Type Last Call Review
Team Transport Area Review Team (tsvart)
Deadline 2020-08-26
Requested 2020-08-12
Authors Clarence Filsfils , Pablo Camarillo , John Leddy , Daniel Voyer , Satoru Matsushima , Zhenbin Li
I-D last updated 2020-08-18
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -17 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -17 by Mirja Kühlewind (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -17 by Brian Weis (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -19 by Brian Weis (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -18 by Brian Haberman (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -20 by Brian Weis (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Mirja Kühlewind
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming by Transport Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 17 (document currently at 28)
Result Ready
Completed 2020-08-18
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC if you reply to or forward this review.

This review did not identify any transport-related issues.

- maybe spell out PE on first occurrence in section 4.8.
- Also maybe spell out BUM in section 4.12 (as well as other abbreviation
there). Also shouldn't it be s/BUM/BUM traffic/ ? - sec 4.13: s/multiple
domains. it is one/multiple domains. It is one/ - Would be good to spell out
PSP, USP and USD right at the beginning of section 4.16