Telechat Review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20
review-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20-secdir-telechat-weis-2020-09-24-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 26)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2020-09-22
Requested 2020-09-08
Authors Clarence Filsfils, Pablo Camarillo, John Leddy, Daniel Voyer, Satoru Matsushima, Zhenbin Li
Draft last updated 2020-09-24
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -17 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -17 by Mirja K├╝hlewind (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -17 by Brian Weis (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -19 by Brian Weis (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -18 by Brian Haberman (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -20 by Brian Weis (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian Weis 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20-secdir-telechat-weis-2020-09-24
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/lgKS8vWiYGgpunNuZ26hMZxh7ik
Reviewed rev. 20 (document currently at 26)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2020-09-24

Review
review-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20-secdir-telechat-weis-2020-09-24

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

A new sentence was added to Security Considerations in version 20. I believe it, combined with the previous sentence, will help clueful developers understand that there may be a need to add HMAC processing even if there is no SRH header. Thanks. None of the other changes in the update appear to affect security considerations.