Last Call Review of draft-ietf-stox-chat-10
review-ietf-stox-chat-10-opsdir-lc-morton-2015-03-01-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-stox-chat |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2015-03-02 | |
Requested | 2015-02-17 | |
Authors | Peter Saint-Andre , Salvatore Loreto | |
I-D last updated | 2015-03-01 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Telechat review of -10
by Brian E. Carpenter
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Al Morton (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Al Morton |
State | Completed Snapshot | |
Review |
review-ietf-stox-chat-10-opsdir-lc-morton-2015-03-01
|
|
Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 11) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2015-03-01 |
review-ietf-stox-chat-10-opsdir-lc-morton-2015-03-01-00
OPS-DIR, Authors, I have reviewed draft-ietf-stox-chat-10, as part of Last Call reviews provided by OPS-Dir. The memo seems ready to publish, as it is one in a series of memos intended to provide gateway functionality between XMPP and SIP protocols. The Core spec for this interworking has already been approved: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7247 as has interworking for presence: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7248 This memo covers chat interworking between XMPP and SIP-based Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP) [RFC4975]. In my mostly un-washed opinion (limited SIP background, zero XMPP), the interworking aspects appear clearly described and ready to publish. In an OPS-DIR review, we must ask about manageability. The approved presence and chat interworking functions require gateways. However, there don't appear to be any drafts in-progress or mention of management of the gateway functions in the RFCs. Perhaps the -stox-chat authors or others would care to comment on XMPP-SIP gateway manageability, and where that might be covered. thanks and regards, Al