Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-rtcp-13
review-ietf-straw-b2bua-rtcp-13-opsdir-lc-vyncke-2016-10-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-rtcp
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2016-10-10
Requested 2016-09-28
Authors Lorenzo Miniero , Sergio Garcia Murillo , Victor Pascual
I-D last updated 2016-10-05
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -13 by Russ Housley (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -15 by Russ Housley (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Yoav Nir (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Éric Vyncke (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -15 by Magnus Westerlund (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Éric Vyncke
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-rtcp by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 17)
Result Ready
Completed 2016-10-05
review-ietf-straw-b2bua-rtcp-13-opsdir-lc-vyncke-2016-10-05-00

Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational
 aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may
 be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG
 chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document is about how SIP back-to-back User Agent can act as
intermediaries in a way to avoid loss of RTCP message data (feedback &
statistics) which is of course of primer importance for operations (for
example, they can also change codec on the
 flight).

As the main focus of the document is to identify potential operational issues
in various deployments and for some deployment the I-D goes in depth and in
details. So, I tend to consider that I have nothing to add about this I-D on
the operation aspects:
 it is good to go :-)

Thanks for this clear document

-éric