IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-suit-mti-17
review-ietf-suit-mti-17-genart-lc-dunbar-2025-06-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-suit-mti
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 22)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2025-06-12
Requested 2025-05-29
Authors Brendan Moran , Øyvind Rønningstad , Akira Tsukamoto
I-D last updated 2025-07-10 (Latest revision 2025-07-07)
Completed reviews Secdir IETF Last Call review of -16 by Magnus Nyström (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -16 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -17 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -18 by Lorenzo Corneo (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -18 by Magnus Nyström (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-suit-mti by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Qb1C37p8hB8Du4nABHCnWzrCtU8
Reviewed revision 17 (document currently at 22)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2025-06-12
review-ietf-suit-mti-17-genart-lc-dunbar-2025-06-12-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-suit-mti-??
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2025-06-12
IETF LC End Date: 2025-06-12
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
I have reviewed the document and find it technically solid and well written.
The draft is ready for publication with only a few Nits:

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

Is ".. the same profile as the is used on .." a typo in the following sentence:
"When using Manifest Recipients Response communication, particularly
data structures that are designed for reporting of update
capabilities, status, progress, or success, the same profile as the
is used on the SUIT manifest SHOULD be used"