IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-suit-report-14
review-ietf-suit-report-14-genart-lc-sarikaya-2025-08-08-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-suit-report |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 22) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2025-08-11 | |
| Requested | 2025-07-28 | |
| Authors | Brendan Moran , Henk Birkholz | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-09-30 (Latest revision 2026-06-23) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -14
by Behcet Sarikaya
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Russ Housley (diff) Genart Telechat review of -15 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -15 by Russ Housley (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Behcet Sarikaya |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-suit-report by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/bQNm2YryFI9o7lnud_-sHDwvV2U | |
| Reviewed revision | 14 (document currently at 22) | |
| Result | Not ready | |
| Completed | 2025-08-08 |
review-ietf-suit-report-14-genart-lc-sarikaya-2025-08-08-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-suit-report-14 Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya Review Date: 2025-08-08 IETF LC End Date: 2025-08-11 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The draft is about updating firmware of IoT devices, it defines a logging container which creates a lightweight feedback mechanism for developers in the event that an update or boot fails in the manifest processor. The container is defined in CDDL format. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: Yes. Nits/editorial comments: Sec. 3 includded -> included Sec. 4 decisiosn -> decisions Sec. 4.2 an unusupported COSE COSE undefined As I write this I discovered another typo unusupported -> unsupported Section 9. Media types issue: I think that sections 9.2 - 9.8 can be omitted Sec. 10. I suggest checking Ross' secdir review I think that RFC 9019 is very informative and useful in reading this draft but I could not see a reference to RFC 9019.