Telechat Review of draft-ietf-suit-report-15
review-ietf-suit-report-15-secdir-telechat-housley-2025-10-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-suit-report |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 20) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-10-21 | |
| Requested | 2025-09-30 | |
| Authors | Brendan Moran , Henk Birkholz | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-05-26 (Latest revision 2026-05-26) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -14
by Behcet Sarikaya
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Russ Housley (diff) Genart Telechat review of -15 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -15 by Russ Housley (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Russ Housley |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-suit-report by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/mxOnSHgLMZq-pb6UdB7Vk53koSc | |
| Reviewed revision | 15 (document currently at 20) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2025-10-06 |
review-ietf-suit-report-15-secdir-telechat-housley-2025-10-06-00
I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area Directors. Document authors, document editors, and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other IETF Last Call comments. Document: draft-ietf-suit-report-15 Reviewer: Russ Housley Review Date: 2025-10-06 IETF LC End Date: 2025-08-11 IESG Telechat date: 2025-10-23 Summary: Has Nits Major Concerns: None Minor Concerns: Section 5: What does the term "well-informed" really mean here? I read the sentence without this term an come away with the same understanding. Can this be dropped? Nits: Section 7: The draft-ietf-suit-manifest document uses "Vendor ID/Class ID". For compatibility, I suggest changing "vendor ID & class ID" to match.