Telechat Review of draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains-10
review-ietf-suit-trust-domains-10-iotdir-telechat-fossati-2025-03-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir) | |
Deadline | 2025-04-10 | |
Requested | 2025-03-06 | |
Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
Authors | Brendan Moran , Ken Takayama | |
I-D last updated | 2025-04-17 (Latest revision 2025-03-03) | |
Completed reviews |
Iotdir Early review of -07
by Thomas Fossati
(diff)
Genart Early review of -07 by Tim Evens (diff) Secdir Early review of -09 by Derrell Piper (diff) Artart IETF Last Call review of -09 by Valery Smyslov (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -10 by Thomas Fossati |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Thomas Fossati |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains by Internet of Things Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/892WspY5QkUMAD7Xbmx9lBd4jMg | |
Reviewed revision | 10 | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2025-03-06 |
review-ietf-suit-trust-domains-10-iotdir-telechat-fossati-2025-03-06-00
Thank you editors for taking into consideration the feedback in my early review, specifically: 1. Clarifying the minimal requirements in 7228(bis) terms for the top-level manifest processor; 2. Adding the dependent manifest in example "0". One remaining nit is that some of the examples contain very long lines. This can be easily fixed using Carsten’s excellent tooling, which provides `:include-fold` (instead of `:include`) to deal with such situations. cheers!