Telechat Review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11
review-ietf-taps-transport-security-11-intdir-telechat-haberman-2020-04-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2020-04-07
Requested 2020-03-26
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Reese Enghardt , Tommy Pauly , Colin Perkins , Kyle Rose , Christopher A. Wood
I-D last updated 2020-04-03
Completed reviews Secdir Early review of -05 by Paul Wouters (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Paul Wouters (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -11 by Brian Haberman (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -11 by Mohit Sethi (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -11 by Susan Hares (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -11 by Paul Wouters (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian Haberman
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-taps-transport-security by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/2IHPgukaAAMvMjO7TXvo_ujcI_I
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 12)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2020-04-03
review-ietf-taps-transport-security-11-intdir-telechat-haberman-2020-04-03-00
This document is a survey of network security protocols and their interaction
with transport and application protocols. It is clearly written and easy to
read. I have a minor comment on the contents of this draft.

It is not abundantly clear what the criteria was for selecting the subset of
security protocols included in this draft. Some notable omissions include SSH,
L2TP, and GRE. These seem like interesting omissions given their popularity in
a number of deployment scenarios. Not a showstopper in my opinion, but
interesting to note.