Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-10
review-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-10-opsdir-telechat-wang-2017-12-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Telechat Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2017-11-28
Requested 2017-10-25
Authors Andrea Bittau, Daniel B. Giffin , Mark J. Handley , David Mazieres , Quinn Slack , Eric W. Smith
I-D last updated 2017-12-19
Completed reviews Rtgdir Telechat review of -07 by John Drake (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Zitao Wang (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Stephen Kent (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -10 by Zitao Wang (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Zitao Wang
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 15)
Result Ready
Completed 2017-12-19
review-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-10-opsdir-telechat-wang-2017-12-19-00
Reviewer: Zitao WANG

Review result: Ready

I have reviewed draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-10 as part of the Operational
directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving the
operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last
call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and
WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

"This document specifies tcpcrypt, a TCP encryption protocol designed for use
in conjunction with the TCP Encryption Negotiation Option (TCP-ENO).  Tcpcrypt
coexists with middleboxes by tolerating resegmentation, NATs, and other
manipulations of the TCP header.  The protocol is self-contained and
specifically tailored to TCP implementations, which often reside in kernels or
other environments in which large external software dependencies can be
undesirable. Because the size of TCP options is limited, the protocol requires
one additional one-way message latency to perform key exchange before
application data may be transmitted.  However, this cost can be avoided between
two hosts that have recently established a previous tcpcrypt connection. "

My overall view of the document is 'Ready' for publication.