Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12

Request Review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type Telechat Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2017-10-25
Requested 2017-10-09
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Other Reviews Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -12 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Please focus on any potential impact on routing applications (BGP, LDP, etc.).
Review State Completed
Reviewer Papadimitriou Dimitri
Review review-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12-rtgdir-telechat-dimitri-2017-10-29
Posted at
Reviewed rev. 12 (document currently at 17)
Review result Has Issues
Draft last updated 2017-10-29
Review closed: 2017-10-29



I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this draft.

As this document is in working group last call, my focus for the review was to determine whether the document has any potential impact on routing applications (BGP, LDP, etc.).

Document: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12
Reviewer: D.Papadimitriou
Review Date: 28-10-2019
Intended Status: Experimental


I have some minor concerns about this document that I think should be resolved before it is submitted to the IESG.


- May be the document can document if there is any modification for what concerns closing of connections (in its current version the document provides a requirement in Section 5 but no actual procedure)


- Include ref. for Section 3 on Terminology (SYN, ACK, etc.)

- Section 4 states " It uses a new TCP option kind " may be worth explaining which *new* kind ?

- s/ 4.5.  The Negotiated Tep/ 4.5.  The Negotiated TEP