Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12
review-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12-rtgdir-telechat-dimitri-2017-10-29-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type Telechat Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2017-10-25
Requested 2017-10-09
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Other Reviews Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -12 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Comments
Please focus on any potential impact on routing applications (BGP, LDP, etc.).
Review State Completed
Reviewer Papadimitriou Dimitri
Review review-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12-rtgdir-telechat-dimitri-2017-10-29
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/UuCvXoqMrjTDDT6_hnWyhnncqZ4
Reviewed rev. 12 (document currently at 17)
Review result Has Issues
Draft last updated 2017-10-29
Review closed: 2017-10-29

Review
review-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12-rtgdir-telechat-dimitri-2017-10-29

Hello

I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this draft. 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno/

As this document is in working group last call, my focus for the review was to determine whether the document has any potential impact on routing applications (BGP, LDP, etc.).

Document: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12
Reviewer: D.Papadimitriou
Review Date: 28-10-2019
Intended Status: Experimental

Summary: 

I have some minor concerns about this document that I think should be resolved before it is submitted to the IESG.

Comments:

- May be the document can document if there is any modification for what concerns closing of connections (in its current version the document provides a requirement in Section 5 but no actual procedure)

Nits:

- Include ref. for Section 3 on Terminology (SYN, ACK, etc.)

- Section 4 states " It uses a new TCP option kind " may be worth explaining which *new* kind ?

- s/ 4.5.  The Negotiated Tep/ 4.5.  The Negotiated TEP

Thanks,
-dimitri.