Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12
review-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12-secdir-telechat-ladd-2017-11-18-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 19) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2017-11-28 | |
| Requested | 2017-10-25 | |
| Authors | Andrea Bittau, Daniel B. Giffin , Mark J. Handley , David Mazieres , Eric W. Smith | |
| Draft last updated | 2017-11-18 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Telechat review of -12
by
Papadimitriou Dimitri
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Watson Ladd (diff) Genart Last Call review of -10 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -12 by Watson Ladd (diff) Genart Telechat review of -10 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -17 by Watson Ladd (diff) Genart Telechat review of -16 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Watson Ladd |
| State | Completed Snapshot | |
| Review |
review-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12-secdir-telechat-ladd-2017-11-18
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 12 (document currently at 19) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2017-11-18 |
review-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12-secdir-telechat-ladd-2017-11-18-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready. I couldn't find anything wrong with it from either a stylistic or content perspective. Sincerely, Watson Ladd