Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-10
review-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-10-genart-lc-even-2015-05-20-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2015-05-22 | |
| Requested | 2015-05-14 | |
| Authors | Gorry Fairhurst , Arjuna Sathiaseelan , Raffaello Secchi | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-05-20 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -10
by Roni Even
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Benjamin Kaduk (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Roni Even |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2015-05-20 |
review-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-10-genart-lc-even-2015-05-20-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-10 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2015–5-20 IETF LC End Date: 2015–5-22 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Experimental RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: I am not sure that there is a need for the first sentence in section 1.2 In section 4.4.1 MSS is used but not expanded Maximum Segment Size (MSS)