Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16
review-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16-iotdir-telechat-eddy-2020-06-30-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 17) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir) | |
Deadline | 2020-07-07 | |
Requested | 2020-06-25 | |
Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
Authors | Mark Allman | |
I-D last updated | 2020-11-23 (Latest revision 2020-07-27) | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -14
by Liang Xia
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -14 by Stewart Bryant (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -16 by Wesley Eddy (diff) Genart Telechat review of -16 by Stewart Bryant (diff) |
|
Comments |
Thank you in advance -éric |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Wesley Eddy |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider by Internet of Things Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/KGPrkW0KJeW__Bf8gWaOXk0d4FY | |
Reviewed revision | 16 (document currently at 17) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2020-06-30 |
review-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16-iotdir-telechat-eddy-2020-06-30-00
This document is clear and easy to understand. From an IoT perspective, I don't have any specific concerns with it. The CoAP spec (RFC 7522) was written referencing an early version of this I-D, so it has already been applied for designing IoT protocols. There are a couple of small typos: - In Section 4 part (1), there is a typo "an some" should just be one of those words. - In Section 4 part (2), there is a typo "is is".