Early Review of draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-06
review-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-06-rtgdir-early-przygienda-2024-05-26-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-06 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | 06 (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-04-30 | |
| Requested | 2024-03-17 | |
| Requested by | Vishnu Pavan Beeram | |
| Authors | Daniel King , John Drake , Haomian Zheng , Adrian Farrel | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-05-20 (Latest revision 2024-08-28) | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -06
by Tony Przygienda
(diff)
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Alvaro Retana (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Joe Clarke (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Peter E. Yee (diff) |
|
| Comments |
This is a Post WGLC review request; 06 version addresses all the comments that were raised during WGLC |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Tony Przygienda |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/oar2lYywDDXSGkQIIUmCvYrM8yM | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 10) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2024-05-25 |
review-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-06-rtgdir-early-przygienda-2024-05-26-00
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. Document: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing Reviewer: Tony Przygienda Intended Status: Informational *Summary:* In short, the draft has been a pleasure to read. It is well structured, informative and carefully laid out presenting actually a good overview of the whole network slicing & service modelling jungle of drafts so overall, time well spent for me ;-) *Comments:* Only thing to remark is that the draft references a lot in-flight drafts in section 4 and given that, after publication the ground may move and it may lose relevance to an extent. I do not consider that likely. *Major Issues:* *None* *Minor Issues:None* *Nits:* Polished, easy on the eye language, nothing sprung out.