Telechat Review of draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange-06

Request Review of draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-05-17
Requested 2016-05-13
Authors Adrian Farrel, John Drake, Nabil Bitar, George Swallow, Daniele Ceccarelli, Xian Zhang
Draft last updated 2016-05-14
Completed reviews Genart Early review of -04 by Brian Carpenter (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Brian Carpenter (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Hilarie Orman (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian Carpenter 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange-06-genart-telechat-carpenter-2016-05-14
Reviewed rev. 06 (document currently at 07)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2016-05-14


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

Document: draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange-06.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2016-05-14
IETF LC End Date: 2016-05-10
IESG Telechat date: 2016-05-19

Summary: Ready


1) Thanks for fixing numerous points from my Last Call review.

2) I also raised the issue of whether BCP is the right status, in view
of sections 5 - 9 which refer to open questions and  possible future
protocol extensions. I would prefer to see these sections clearly
labelled as *not* part of the normative content. After feedback from
the authors, I don't see this as a show-stopper, but I think that
readers expecting a concrete description of a solution will be a
little surprised.