Last Call Review of draft-ietf-teas-network-assigned-upstream-label-10
review-ietf-teas-network-assigned-upstream-label-10-opsdir-lc-bonica-2018-01-10-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-teas-network-assigned-upstream-label |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-12-29 | |
Requested | 2017-12-15 | |
Authors | Xian Zhang , Vishnu Pavan Beeram , Igor Bryskin , Daniele Ceccarelli , Oscar Gonzalez de Dios | |
I-D last updated | 2018-01-10 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -06
by Acee Lindem
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Ron Bonica (diff) Genart Last Call review of -10 by Stewart Bryant (diff) Genart Telechat review of -11 by Stewart Bryant (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Ron Bonica |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-teas-network-assigned-upstream-label by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 12) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2018-01-10 |
review-ietf-teas-network-assigned-upstream-label-10-opsdir-lc-bonica-2018-01-10-00
Folks, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: Ready for publication In fact, extremely well written and well considered. If I were on the IESG, I would give it a YES Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits: None