Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24

Request Review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 27)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2023-07-11
Requested 2023-06-27
Authors Adrian Farrel
I-D last updated 2023-07-06
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -24 by Shawn M Emery (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -24 by Rich Salz (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -24 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -24 by Bob Briscoe (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -24 by Brian Haberman (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -21 by John Drake (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Behcet Sarikaya
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 24 (document currently at 27)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2023-07-06
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-??
Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya
Review Date: 2023-07-06
IETF LC End Date: 2023-07-11
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:This document is a bis document intended to obsolete RFC3272 that
describes the principles of traffic engineering in the Internet. Since RFC3272
published in 2003 is an informational RFC, this document's status is also set
as informational RFC although it could have been a BCP. The document gives a
nice account of all changes that happened on traffic engineering since the past
20 years. I specifically looked for IPv6, YANG to replace SNMP, SDN,
Virtualization and also Quic and MPTCP in the context of ATSSS, they were all
very well covered. The document is very well written. What I couldn't find are
the coverage of cloud issues, edge computing, data center interconnect which
are just mentioned and identifier locator separation work not even mentioned.

Major issues:N/A

Minor issues:N/A

Nits/editorial comments:
The last two references FT01 and GRPC have n.d. meaning no date?
The document has a nice terminology section 1.4 and most acronyms have been
spelled out but there is no acronyms section