Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-09
review-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-09-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-12-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2017-11-30
Requested 2017-11-13
Requested by Deborah Brungard
Authors Huaimo Chen , Autumn Liu , Tarek Saad , Fengman Xu , Lu Huang
Draft last updated 2017-12-18
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -09 by Russ White (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -13 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -14 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Comments
In prep for IETF Last Call
Assignment Reviewer Russ White
State Completed
Review review-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-09-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-12-18
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready
Completed 2017-12-18
review-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-09-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-12-18-00
Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
‚Äčhttp://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection
Reviewer: Russ White
Review Date: 18 December 2018
IETF LC End Date: date-if-known
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary:
No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

This document is readable; the illustrations and explanations are clear and
concise.

Major Issues:
No major issues found.

Minor Issues:
No minor issues found.

/r