Last Call Review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-09
review-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-09-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-12-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2017-11-30
Requested 2017-11-13
Requested by Deborah Brungard
Authors Huaimo Chen, Autumn Liu, Tarek Saad, Fengman Xu, Lu Huang
Draft last updated 2017-12-18
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -09 by Russ White (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -13 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -14 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Comments
In prep for IETF Last Call
Assignment Reviewer Russ White 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-09-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-12-18
Reviewed rev. 09 (document currently at 16)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2017-12-18

Review
review-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-09-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-12-18

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ‚Äčhttp://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection
Reviewer: Russ White 
Review Date: 18 December 2018
IETF LC End Date: date-if-known 
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary: 
No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

This document is readable; the illustrations and explanations are clear and concise. 

Major Issues:
No major issues found.

Minor Issues:
No minor issues found.

/r