Early Review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10
|Requested rev.||10 (document currently at 11)|
|Team||YANG Doctors (yangdoctors)|
|Requested by||Mehmet Ersue|
|Draft last updated||2018-10-24|
Intdir Early review of -07 by Dave Thaler
Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Samuel Weiler (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -10 by Radek Krejčí (diff)
No YANG Doctors review has been done yet.
|Reviewed rev.||10 (document currently at 11)|
|Review result||Ready with Nits|
This is my YANG-doctor review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10. I have reviewed it mainly from the YANG perspective, since I'm not familiar with IEEE 1588. The draft as well as the YANG module ietf-ptp@2018-09-10 are in a good shape and ready to publish. I have only 2, say, editorial notes. 1) email of Rodney Cummings in the module's contact statement misses (in contrast to emails of other authors) starting ('<') and ending ('>') tags. 2) I don't see any reason for the following paragraph in the appendix A3: Under the assumptions of section A.1, the first IEEE 1588 YANG module prefix can be the same as the last IETF 1588 YANG module prefix (i.e. "ptp"), since the nodes within both YANG modules are compatible. Since the module's prefix is used only locally, it may change when the module is updated (RFC 7950, sec. 11). So the mentioned paragraph seems pointless to me (and therefore confusing for readers).