Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03
review-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03-genart-lc-halpern-2013-12-20-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2013-12-27 | |
Requested | 2013-12-19 | |
Authors | Stephan Friedl, Andrei Popov , Adam Langley , Stephan Emile | |
I-D last updated | 2013-12-20 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03
by Joel M. Halpern
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -04 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Victor Kuarsingh (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Joel M. Halpern |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Ready w/issues | |
Completed | 2013-12-20 |
review-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03-genart-lc-halpern-2013-12-20-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03 Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application Layer Protocol Negotiation Extension Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 20-December-2013 IETF LC End Date: 27-December-2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: It appears that the ProtocolNameList is required to have at least two entries, based on "protocol_name_list<2..2^16-1>. Why are at least two required, and how is the reconciled with the fact that when the the servers send a response using this construct it is required to include only 1 value? Nits/editorial comments: