Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv-03
review-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv-03-opsdir-lc-morton-2015-01-20-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2015-01-23 | |
| Requested | 2015-01-13 | |
| Authors | Bodo Moeller , Adam Langley | |
| Draft last updated | 2015-01-20 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03
by
Russ Housley
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Yoav Nir (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Al Morton (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Al Morton |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv-03-opsdir-lc-morton-2015-01-20
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2015-01-20 |
review-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv-03-opsdir-lc-morton-2015-01-20-00
Authors, OPS-DIR, I have reviewed draft-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv-03 as part of Last Call reviews provided by OPS-Dir. The memo seems ready to publish, and contains a section on operational considerations for server upgrades (which can be conducted more smoothly if the recommendations are followed). I only suggest to highlight the presence of these considerations in the abstract, so operators are more likely to find them. Something like: "Server upgrade considerations are included." Thanks for preparing that section. regards, Al