Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-08
review-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-08-secdir-lc-wierenga-2015-05-15-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2015-04-17 | |
| Requested | 2015-04-09 | |
| Authors | Daniel Kahn Gillmor | |
| Draft last updated | 2015-05-15 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -08
by
Tom Taylor
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Tom Taylor (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Klaas Wierenga (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Klaas Wierenga |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-08-secdir-lc-wierenga-2015-05-15
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 10) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2015-05-15 |
review-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-08-secdir-lc-wierenga-2015-05-15-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document modifies TLS to use a section of the “EC Named Curves” registry to advertise support for common Finite Field Diffie Hellman group parameters. I believe the document is ready for publication. The document is clear and I believe the approach makes sense and is potentially very helpful in establishing sensible group parameters. -- Klaas Wierenga Identity Architect Cisco Cloud Services