Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09

Request Review of draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2020-11-30
Requested 2020-11-09
Authors Kathleen Moriarty , Stephen Farrell
I-D last updated 2020-11-25
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Adam W. Montville (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Mohit Sethi (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Nagendra Kumar Nainar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Mohit Sethi
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 12)
Result Ready
Completed 2020-11-25
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09
Reviewer: Mohit Sethi
Review Date: 2020-11-25
IETF LC End Date: 2020-11-30
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This document deprecates older versions of TLS and DTLS. It also
updates many RFCs that normatively refer to the older TLS/DTLS versions.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: In section 1.1, typo in "waas defined to detect".

Most references to RFCs are of the form "[RFC7507]". Can we change "RFC 7457
[RFC7457]" to "[RFC7457]" for uniformity. Similarly, perhaps you could change
"RFC5246 [RFC5246]" and "RFC4346 [RFC4346]" to "[RFC5246]" and "[RFC4346]".

In section 2 "NIST for example have provided " should be "..has provided...".

In section 6 "this document is called out specifically to update text
implementing the deprecation  recommendations of this document." I was
initially confused with the repeated usage of "this". Perhaps it would help to
be more explicit.