Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-11
review-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-11-secdir-lc-schwartz-2025-03-13-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-04-09 | |
| Requested | 2025-03-12 | |
| Authors | Joseph A. Salowey , Sean Turner | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-03-13 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -11
by Benjamin M. Schwartz
Artart Last Call review of -11 by Barry Leiba |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Benjamin M. Schwartz |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/O_f9x49Y-DVSXem7nahW3V2cHu0 | |
| Reviewed revision | 11 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2025-03-13 |
review-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-11-secdir-lc-schwartz-2025-03-13-00
Nit: "leave an items", lower case "* update the note on the role ...". Use of BCP 14 "IANA SHALL" seems odd, but I assume IANA process experts have reviewed this formulation. I wish this document would populate the "Comment" column on some of the discouraged entries, or at least note the reasoning in the body of the document. As it stands, it seems that a reader could find a discouraged entry in these registries, read the Comment column, read all the linked reference documents (including this one), and still find no explanation for why it is discouraged.