Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tls-ssl2-must-not-
review-ietf-tls-ssl2-must-not-secdir-lc-moriarty-2010-12-16-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tls-ssl2-must-not |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2010-12-14 | |
| Requested | 2010-12-03 | |
| Authors | Tim Polk , Sean Turner | |
| I-D last updated | 2010-12-16 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -??
by Kathleen Moriarty
|
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Kathleen Moriarty |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-tls-ssl2-must-not by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Completed | 2010-12-16 |
review-ietf-tls-ssl2-must-not-secdir-lc-moriarty-2010-12-16-00
Hello, draft-ietf-tls-ssl2-must-not-03 looks good from a security perspective. My only question is to ask if the document should list out any previously published RFCs that contain references to use TLS or at least those that contain TLS v2? I reviewed a similar one for Sean last month and it did contain references. Thanks, Kathleen