Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tls-sslv3-diediedie-02
review-ietf-tls-sslv3-diediedie-02-genart-lc-taylor-2015-03-30-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tls-sslv3-diediedie
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-03-30
Requested 2015-03-19
Authors Richard Barnes , Martin Thomson , Alfredo Pironti , Adam Langley
I-D last updated 2015-03-30
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Tom Taylor (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Fred Baker (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tom Taylor
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-tls-sslv3-diediedie by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 03)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2015-03-30
review-ietf-tls-sslv3-diediedie-02-genart-lc-taylor-2015-03-30-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-tls-sslv3-diediedie-02
Reviewer: Tom Taylor
Review Date: 29 Mar 2015
IETF LC End Date: 30 Mar 20154
IESG Telechat date: (if known)



Summary: This document is good to go subject to the resolution of nits. 


Note normative downrefs to Informational RFC 4492 and Historic RFC 6101.




Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

1. IDNits has a number of complaints that should be resolved:


  -- the UPDATES mentions RFC 5246 but it is not identified in the 


Abstract. Rather, "the TLS RFCs" are cited. Could I suggest adding "and 


explicitly RFC 5246" after that phrase. I can see where adding the 


others would get into a bit of a mess because they are obsoleted.



  -- a second IDNits complaint relates to missing RFC 2119 boilerplate.


  -- finally, there are several complaints about references, at least 


one of which is readily fixable.



  -- the other complaints relate to references.



2. Editorial style: Introduction first sentence: I'd suggest moving the 


phrase "since it was released in 1996" to the beginning of the sentence, 


followed by a comma.




3. Incomplete thought: Introduction final sentence:

OLD
SSLv3 now follows.

NEW
This view is now extended to include SSLv3.