Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech-06
review-ietf-tls-svcb-ech-06-dnsdir-lc-gannon-2024-11-23-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | DNS Directorate (dnsdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-11-15 | |
Requested | 2024-10-22 | |
Authors | Benjamin M. Schwartz , Mike Bishop , Erik Nygren | |
I-D last updated | 2024-11-23 | |
Completed reviews |
Dnsdir Early review of -01
by Ted Lemon
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -06 by Barry Leiba Genart Last Call review of -06 by Lucas Pardue Dnsdir Last Call review of -06 by James Gannon |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | James Gannon |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech by DNS Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/qnPyh-Jc9qzkhKXaeyCQMApaq8o | |
Reviewed revision | 06 | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-11-23 |
review-ietf-tls-svcb-ech-06-dnsdir-lc-gannon-2024-11-23-00
Hi Folks, I am the assigned DNS Directorate reviewer for this. Apologies for the late review; we had a reviewer switch during the cycle. I have read the document, and while I am not a TLS guy who can wrap my head around it well enough, I see that Ted's comments from the -01 have been incorporated after discussion on the list back in March so from that perspective green light from me. I see no other major issues with my own review of the document. I will echo Barry's two nits on the ART review. They would be good to tidy up, but from the DNSDIR perspective, we are good. Thank you and apologies again for the late review.