Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-06
review-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-06-secdir-lc-lonvick-2025-02-16-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2025-02-25 | |
Requested | 2025-02-11 | |
Authors | Rich Salz , Nimrod Aviram | |
I-D last updated | 2025-02-16 | |
Completed reviews |
Tsvart Last Call review of -05
by Yoshifumi Nishida
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Chris M. Lonvick Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Jen Linkova |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Chris M. Lonvick |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/sp1SyoNCojONb09MlyttBK-RN9U | |
Reviewed revision | 06 | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2025-02-16 |
review-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-06-secdir-lc-lonvick-2025-02-16-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready. I see from the -05 reviews that this version has been moved to the Proposed Standard. I agree that this is appropriate. Overall, the document is clear and understandable. Minor nit: The suggested Note has "indication indication" in it. Regards, Chris