Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tls-tls13-24
review-ietf-tls-tls13-24-secdir-lc-salz-2018-02-16-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tls-tls13 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 28) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2018-03-01 | |
| Requested | 2018-02-15 | |
| Authors | Eric Rescorla | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-02-16 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -24
by Rich Salz
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -24 by Dale R. Worley (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Rich Salz |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-tls-tls13 by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 24 (document currently at 28) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2018-02-16 |
review-ietf-tls-tls13-24-secdir-lc-salz-2018-02-16-00
I have discovered an elegant little proof that shows TLS 1.3 is not secure, unfortunately I do not have the room to fit it in this textbox. I will send email tomorrow... No, seriously, this protocol has been designed with the help of world-class cryptographers and academics. It has been analyzed with verification tools. It has been tweaked as necessary to get around middlebox ossification. It is available in two highly popular browsers and at least one widely-used open source toolkit. This document is READY.