Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03
review-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03-genart-lc-even-2014-06-23-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-06-24
Requested 2014-06-12
Authors Marc Petit-Huguenin , Gonzalo Salgueiro
I-D last updated 2014-06-23
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -03 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Simon Josefsson (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 05)
Result Ready
Completed 2014-06-23
review-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03-genart-lc-even-2014-06-23-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.

Document:

draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2014–6-23

IETF LC End Date: 2014–6-25

IESG Telechat date:



Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Standard track RFC

.





Major issues:



Minor issues:



I am not sure I understand section 4.3. When talking about “media keep-alive
packets” is it for the STUN Binding Indication usage or for all the options in
section 10 of RFC 5245.  Maybe you meant that you should prefer DTLS/SRTP
keep-alive like RTP no-op in this case. I had problem understanding this
section. Please clarify.







Nits/editorial comments: