Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03
review-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03-genart-lc-even-2014-06-23-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-06-24
Requested 2014-06-12
Draft last updated 2014-06-23
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -03 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Simon Josefsson (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Review review-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03-genart-lc-even-2014-06-23
Reviewed rev. 03 (document currently at 05)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2014-06-23

Review
review-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03-genart-lc-even-2014-06-23

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document:  

draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2014–6-23

IETF LC End Date: 2014–6-25

IESG Telechat date: 

 

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Standard track RFC

.

 

 

Major issues:

 

Minor issues:

 

I am not sure I understand section 4.3. When talking about “media keep-alive packets” is it for the STUN Binding Indication usage or for all the options in section 10 of RFC 5245.  Maybe you meant that you should prefer DTLS/SRTP keep-alive like RTP no-op in this case. I had problem understanding this section. Please clarify.

 

 

 

Nits/editorial comments: