Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09
review-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09-genart-lc-even-2018-09-03-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 20) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2018-09-12 | |
Requested | 2018-08-29 | |
Authors | Marc Petit-Huguenin , Gonzalo Salgueiro | |
I-D last updated | 2018-09-03 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -09
by Roni Even
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Carl Wallace (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Éric Vyncke (diff) Genart Telechat review of -10 by Roni Even (diff) Tsvart Telechat review of -10 by Gorry Fairhurst (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Roni Even |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 20) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2018-09-03 |
review-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09-genart-lc-even-2018-09-03-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2018-09-03 IETF LC End Date: 2018-09-12 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The documents is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits and minor issues Major issues: Minor issues: 1. The security section says " The PMTUD mechanism described in this document does not introduce any specific security considerations" yet section 5.1 talk about amplification attack Nits/editorial comments: 1. In section 2 last paragraph "Probe Indications of various sizes" any guidelines about the sizes and how many indications?