Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09
review-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09-genart-lc-even-2018-09-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-09-12
Requested 2018-08-29
Other Reviews Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Carl Wallace (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by √Čric Vyncke
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Roni Even
Tsvart Telechat review of -10 by Gorry Fairhurst
Review State Completed
Reviewer Roni Even
Review review-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09-genart-lc-even-2018-09-03
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/vUYCoiNWsTAjkcTuqjvPZsz_g4M
Reviewed rev. 09 (document currently at 10)
Review result Ready with Nits
Draft last updated 2018-09-03
Review completed: 2018-09-03

Review
review-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09-genart-lc-even-2018-09-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2018-09-03
IETF LC End Date: 2018-09-12
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The documents is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits and minor issues

Major issues:

Minor issues:

1. The security section says " The PMTUD mechanism described in this document does not introduce any
   specific security considerations" yet section 5.1 talk about amplification attack


Nits/editorial comments: 

1.  In section 2 last paragraph "Probe Indications of various sizes" any guidelines about the sizes and how many indications?