Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09
review-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09-genart-lc-even-2018-09-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 20)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-09-12
Requested 2018-08-29
Authors Marc Petit-Huguenin , Gonzalo Salgueiro
I-D last updated 2024-12-18 (Latest revision 2021-03-28)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -09 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -09 by Carl Wallace (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Éric Vyncke (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Roni Even (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -10 by Gorry Fairhurst (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 20)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2018-09-03
review-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09-genart-lc-even-2018-09-03-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2018-09-03
IETF LC End Date: 2018-09-12
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The documents is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits and
minor issues

Major issues:

Minor issues:

1. The security section says " The PMTUD mechanism described in this document
does not introduce any
   specific security considerations" yet section 5.1 talk about amplification
   attack

Nits/editorial comments:

1.  In section 2 last paragraph "Probe Indications of various sizes" any
guidelines about the sizes and how many indications?