Early Review of draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization-05
review-ietf-trill-arp-optimization-05-rtgdir-early-huston-2016-04-25-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Early Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2016-04-25
Requested 2016-04-14
Draft last updated 2016-04-25
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -00 by Eric Gray (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -05 by Geoff Huston (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Dale Worley (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Mahesh Jethanandani (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Tina Tsou (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Geoff Huston
State Completed
Review review-ietf-trill-arp-optimization-05-rtgdir-early-huston-2016-04-25
Reviewed rev. 05 (document currently at 09)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2016-04-25

Review
review-ietf-trill-arp-optimization-05-rtgdir-early-huston-2016-04-25

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir



Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization-05.txt
Reviewer: Geoff Huston
Review Date: 16 April 2016
IETF LC End Date: date-if-known 
Intended Status: copy-from-I-D

Summary: 
	This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be considered prior to publication.

Comments:
	I found the draft concise and clear. It was readable and readily understood.

Major Issues:
	No major issues found


Minor Issues:
	No minor issues found.

Nits:
	Minor:
	 section 2: “...receive and save such mapping information also.” seems a bit stilted  and I would say “also receive and save such mapping information.

         section 3.1 "populate the information of sender's IP/MAC in its ARP table”. Do the authors really mean "ARP table" if the information was learned by ND? i.e. its clear that the authors are referring to the local IP/MAC address table, but the previous text tends to associated ARP with IPv4 and ND with IPv6. Perhaps “AARP/ND table” ?