Last Call Review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
review-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09-genart-lc-yee-2016-07-02-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2016-07-05 | |
| Requested | 2016-06-30 | |
| Authors | Donald E. Eastlake 3rd , Mohammed Umair , Yizhou Li | |
| I-D last updated | 2016-07-02 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -09
by Peter E. Yee
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Peter E. Yee (diff) Genart Last Call review of -10 by Peter E. Yee (diff) Secdir Early review of -07 by Yaron Sheffer (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Yaron Sheffer (diff) Opsdir Early review of -07 by Ron Bonica (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -07 by Jonathan Hardwick (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Peter E. Yee |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2016-07-02 |
review-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09-genart-lc-yee-2016-07-02-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09 Reviewer: Peter Yee Review Date: July 1, 2016 IETF LC End Date: July 1, 2016 IESG Telechat date: July 7, 2016 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as a Proposed Standard, but has some nits that should be fixed before publication. [Ready with nits] This draft extends TRILL RBridge Channels so that they can transmit additional, tunneled message types. Security services for RBridge Channel messages can be provisioned via RFC 5310 authentication and/or DTLS. The draft is well-written and easy to understand in the larger TRILL context. The nits noted in the Last Call review will be addressed in a new version of the draft, as already discussed with one of the authors. This review is posted in order to make the Telechat deadline, as the date for the next draft is not known to this reviewer. The previous (Last Call) review can be found here: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg13423.html