Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-trill-clear-correct-04

Request Review of draft-ietf-trill-clear-correct
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2012-07-03
Requested 2012-06-28
Authors Donald E. Eastlake 3rd , Mingui Zhang , Anoop Ghanwani , Vishwas Manral , Ayan Banerjee
Draft last updated 2012-08-21
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -?? by Meral Shirazipour
Genart Telechat review of -04 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
State Completed
Review review-ietf-trill-clear-correct-04-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2012-08-21
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready with Nits
Completed 2012-08-21
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a
new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-trill-clear-correct-04
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2012-07-03
IETF LC End Date: 2012-06-20
IESG Telechat date: 2012-07-05

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I have
some last editorial comments.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
-Consistency with RFC6325, [Page 18], below the table, "end station service
disable bit" --missing dash--> "end-station service disable bit"

-Consistency: Acronyms are usually spelled out, then followed by the acronym in
parenthesis [when first used]. On few occasions this has been reversed, ex.
check for: "EISS (Enhanced Internal Sublayer Service)", "DRB (Designated
RBridge)" vs "Reverse Path Forwarding Check (RPFC)"

-Informative References, Ref. [802], please if you get a chance verify again
the date of this document :) I checked again on the version freely available at

, it says "7 February, 2002". I could not find anything dated "8 March, 2002".


Meral Shirazipour