Last Call Review of draft-ietf-trill-cmt-08

Request Review of draft-ietf-trill-cmt
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2015-10-13
Requested 2015-09-28
Authors Tissa Senevirathne, Janardhanan Pathangi, Jon Hudson
Draft last updated 2015-10-12
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Charlie Kaufman (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Tina Tsou (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -06 by Stig Venaas (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tina Tsou
State Completed
Review review-ietf-trill-cmt-08-opsdir-lc-tsou-2015-10-12
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 11)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2015-10-12


Dear all,


I have reviewed this document as part of the operations directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the

IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operations area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat

these comments just like any other last call comments. 


Control plane extension is used for tree selection notification. I see the advantage of it to use the exiting hardware with software upgrading only. Such feature is of great value for deployment.


Section 5.7 

After sentence about tunnelling, another sentence could be added as following.

“It should be noted that tunneling would require silicon change though CMT itself is software upgrading only.”


It can be also added in the introduction or abstract, CMT method doesn’t need hardware upgrade, this is the biggest advantage of CMT.



Thank you,