Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05

Request Review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-07-21
Requested 2014-07-01
Authors Tal Mizrahi , Tissa Senevirathne , Samer Salam , Deepak Kumar , Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
I-D last updated 2014-08-03
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Alexey Melnikov (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Alexey Melnikov
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2014-08-03
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 

you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
Review Date: 3 August 2014
IETF LC End Date: 21 July 2014
IESG Telechat date: 7 August 2014

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC.
[Ready with nits]

Major issues: None

Minor issues:

Section 6.4: who allocated opcodes? I.e. is there a registry?


I think it would be better to say that all "Reserved" fields are set to 

0 by the sender and ignored by the receiver.