Last Call Review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05
review-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05-genart-lc-melnikov-2014-08-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-07-21
Requested 2014-07-01
Authors Tal Mizrahi, Tissa Senevirathne, Samer Salam, Deepak Kumar, Donald Eastlake
Draft last updated 2014-08-03
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Alexey Melnikov (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Joseph Salowey (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Alexey Melnikov
State Completed
Review review-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05-genart-lc-melnikov-2014-08-03
Reviewed rev. 05 (document currently at 08)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2014-08-03

Review
review-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05-genart-lc-melnikov-2014-08-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>



Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 


you may receive.




Document: draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
Review Date: 3 August 2014
IETF LC End Date: 21 July 2014
IESG Telechat date: 7 August 2014

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC.
[Ready with nits]

Major issues: None

Minor issues:

Section 6.4: who allocated opcodes? I.e. is there a registry?

Nits:



I think it would be better to say that all "Reserved" fields are set to 


0 by the sender and ignored by the receiver.