Last Call Review of draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname-05
review-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname-05-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2015-09-11-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2015-09-15 | |
Requested | 2015-09-01 | |
Authors | Hongjun Zhai , Tissa Senevirathne , Radia Perlman , Mingui Zhang , Yizhou Li | |
I-D last updated | 2015-09-11 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Russ Housley
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Russ Housley (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Carl Wallace (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -05 by Russ White (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Linda Dunbar |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 07) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2015-09-11 |
review-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname-05-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2015-09-11-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This draft is written very clear, but I have a few questions: - Mechanism proposed by this draft is to solve the same problem by “draft-ietf-trill-aa-multi-attach”. Are those two mechanisms equally good? Is there any pros and cons comparing those two mechanisms (i.e. the Pseudo name vs. Active-Active attachment protocol? - The end of the Section 3 has a note on how to reduce the consumption of nicknames. What if CE1 is connected to RB1/RB2, CE2 is connected to RB2/RB3, and CE3 is connected to RB1/RB3, do you need total of 3 Pseudo nicknames for them? Plus the original nicknames for RB1, RB2, and RB3, so total of 6 nicknames are needed for this configuration, correct? Linda Dunbar