Last Call Review of draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel-06
review-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel-06-opsdir-lc-liu-2017-06-23-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-06-28 | |
Requested | 2017-06-14 | |
Authors | Radia Perlman , Donald E. Eastlake 3rd , Mingui Zhang , Anoop Ghanwani , Hongjun Zhai | |
I-D last updated | 2017-06-23 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -01
by Stig Venaas
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Stewart Bryant (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Will (Shucheng) LIU (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Will (Shucheng) LIU |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 07) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-06-23 |
review-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel-06-opsdir-lc-liu-2017-06-23-00
I have reviewed draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel-06 as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. "This informational document enumerates and examines alternatives based on a number of factors including backward compatibility, simplicity, and scalability and makes recommendations in some cases."" The document was well written, and I didn't find any nit in it. The RFC editor might modify and place the copyright part in the usual position. My overall view of the document is 'Ready' for publication.