Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08
review-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08-genart-lc-carpenter-2016-08-29-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-09-08
Requested 2016-08-25
Authors Ruediger Geib , David L. Black
I-D last updated 2016-08-29
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Benjamin Kaduk (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -09 by Lou Berger (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian E. Carpenter
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 14)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2016-08-29
review-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08-genart-lc-carpenter-2016-08-29-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2016-08-29
IETF LC End Date: 2016-09-08
IESG Telechat date:

Summary: Ready with nits
--------

Comments:
---------

1. I was co-chair of the original diffserv WG, and I have tracked this draft
throughout its life and influenced some of its content. I have re-read it
carefully for this review.

2. I believe it is correctly positioned as Informational. It might become a
candidate for BCP with deployment experience.

Nits:
-----

Section 4 mentions RFC2575, certainly a typo for RFC2475.

Non-reference mentions of RFCs are inconsistent, e.g. both "RFC4594" and  "RFC 4594" occur.