Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry-05
review-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry-05-genart-lc-holmberg-2018-05-23-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2018-05-25 | |
Requested | 2018-05-11 | |
Authors | Gorry Fairhurst | |
I-D last updated | 2018-05-23 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -05
by Robert Sparks
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Christer Holmberg (diff) Genart Telechat review of -06 by Christer Holmberg (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Christer Holmberg |
State | Completed Snapshot | |
Review |
review-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry-05-genart-lc-holmberg-2018-05-23
|
|
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 08) | |
Result | Almost Ready | |
Completed | 2018-05-23 |
review-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry-05-genart-lc-holmberg-2018-05-23-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry-05 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 2018-05-23 IETF LC End Date: 2018-05-25 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is well written, and almost ready for publication. I have one minor editorial comment that I'd like the authors to address. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: The Abstract says: "This update to RFC2474 changes the IANA assignment method..." ...and the Introduction says: "To allow the IETF to utilise Pool 3 codepoints, this document requests IANA to to manage Pool 3 assignments for DSCP values in Pool 3 via the Standards Action policy [RFC8126]. This assignment method requires publication of a Standards Track or Best Current Practice RFC." I suggest to replace "method" with "policy".