Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06
review-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06-opsdir-lc-wicinski-2014-12-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2014-12-22
Requested 2014-12-15
Authors Dr. Joseph D. Touch
I-D last updated 2014-12-28
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -06 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Dan Harkins (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tim Wicinski
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 11)
Result Has nits
Completed 2014-12-28
review-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06-opsdir-lc-wicinski-2014-12-28-00
(I was out last week, so i'm a bit slow in catching up)



 I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's 


ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. 


 These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 


operational area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 


these comments just like any other last call comments.




Overall I found the document a companion to RFC6335.

I only found one typo!

50:designers on how to use the transport protocol port number space. *IT*

I assume that should be "It" and not "IT"



The document has a lot of recommendations spread across the document and 


the compliance requirement statements are preceded with '>>' but they 


don't stand out enough while reading the document,.  Would An appendix 


of all of them complied with links back into the main document be 


useful? or overkill?




tim