Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-16
review-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-16-secdir-telechat-mandelberg-2021-11-05-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 19) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2021-12-14 | |
| Requested | 2021-10-29 | |
| Authors | Randall R. Stewart , Michael Tüxen , Karen Nielsen | |
| Draft last updated | 2021-11-05 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -15
by
Ines Robles
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -15 by Eliot Lear (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -15 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -15 by David Mandelberg (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -16 by David Mandelberg (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | David Mandelberg |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-16-secdir-telechat-mandelberg-2021-11-05
|
|
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/gZkBnqQzKhT_6-XGHSf5Z5dhzXM | |
| Reviewed revision | 16 (document currently at 19) | |
| Result | Has Nits | |
| Completed | 2021-11-05 |
review-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-16-secdir-telechat-mandelberg-2021-11-05-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready with nits. (nit) I thought section 5.1.3 was going to have an example of what "reasonably frequently" means?