Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-16
review-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-16-secdir-telechat-mandelberg-2021-11-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 19)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2021-12-14
Requested 2021-10-29
Authors Randall R. Stewart , Michael Tüxen , Karen Nielsen
Draft last updated 2021-11-05
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -15 by Ines Robles (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -15 by Eliot Lear (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -15 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by David Mandelberg (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -16 by David Mandelberg (diff)
Assignment Reviewer David Mandelberg
State Completed
Review review-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-16-secdir-telechat-mandelberg-2021-11-05
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/gZkBnqQzKhT_6-XGHSf5Z5dhzXM
Reviewed revision 16 (document currently at 19)
Result Has Nits
Completed 2021-11-05
review-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-16-secdir-telechat-mandelberg-2021-11-05-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready with nits.

(nit) I thought section 5.1.3 was going to have an example of what "reasonably frequently" means?